Showing posts with label television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label television. Show all posts
Friday, February 10, 2012
Family Ties and Bindings
I know a very talented composer/song-writer. Like so many in the music biz who blow my mind, he is versatile and able with a whole mess of instruments and can, all by himself, compose, arrange and record a full score's worth of music all by himself, playing every part, with a little home-recording equipment and mixer. Amazing. Because he insists on having ridiculous extravagances like uninterrupted health insurance and paying his bills in a timely manner, he teaches and manages in addition to composing, but he longs for a day when he a score gig, theme-song or recurring jingle pays well enough that he can devote his working days to music full time.
He landed a commercial, a national commercial, which doesn't equate to suddenly living in a beach house in Malibu but is, nonetheless, a monster big deal, especially to those of us still on the breaking-in side of any creative industry. He excitedly shared this fantastic news with his family, explaining that he'd sold an original song that would then be recorded and played, nation-wide, on multiple channels, etc. Very exciting stuff. Through it all, his mom uh-huhed and smiled and listened, and then said, "I don't see how this makes you money, though." He explained again about copyright and pay-per-play and rates varying by channel and exposure and repeated play. "Uh-huh," she said, still confused. "But why do they pay you for that?"
His big news fell like a stone. It was kicked around a little through dinner. Finally, he stopped trying to make his mom understand not only that he would earn money every time the song was used but that he deserved to be paid for each use. He returned to SoCal and LaLa Land a little heart-broken.
Family is such a funny thing. Nothing means more or is harder to get than a ringing family endorsement, and no rejection by colleagues, friends or strangers stings quite like an unenthusiastic, "it's nice but--" from a relation. It's especially problematic when your work is outside the familial expertise or taste. Help-books and friends tell you to harness these feelings, channel them into your work, because they are potent and real and universal, feelings rooted in the deepest love and respect --
These are the feelings that make lifelong careers!
For therapists.
ba-dah-dah-dah!
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Art, With a Big "A"
I doubt it's as easy to be a critic as I like to think, but it's certainly easy to criticize, especially ourselves. So many times I catch myself side-tracking my creative process with concerns that what I'm doing or making or writing or drawing isn't good enough without batting that self-destructive question back to my inner critic (which is where all such stupid questions originate) with a "good enough for what?" Another good follow-up is for whom?
If you love art and the Arts (with a big A), it can be easy to confuse your creative process and what you do with sum total greatness of the greats who came before you. If you're really hard on yourself, you'll even pretend Rembrandt and Keats were not beholden to market factors like finding funding, reaching the right audience, and paying rent.
None of them--let me say that again because it's important and bears repeating--NONE WERE GREAT FROM THE START! Every great artiste drops some pretty stinky bombs on occasion, some which sell and some that don't. And they all have to eat.
Even the jokers who had patrons a-plenty in their pockets, the ones who slept with all the right people or had perfect raw talent straight out of the womb, even they (and I've no idea who I'd be talking about now) self-censored, catered to the tastes of others, were frustrated by the limits of their own talent and materials, prayed for more or less time, better inspiration, faster results and more efficient productivity.
Art does not begin as Art. It doesn't typically finish as Art, either. It starts small, sometimes as only a fraction of an idea or feeling. Sometimes it's allowed to find its way like a child in the woods, learning and evolving as goes. Other times, like a child in the woods, it gets battered or eaten, its remains found by the child-ideas tripping along behind it, who then run back to you shattered and scarred...
Maybe not the best simile.
I sometimes hear people say movies or television are so formulaic.
"Oh, snore. That's so predictable."
Well, of course it's predictable. Shakespeare is predictable. You knew it was predictable, you wanted it to be predictable, that's why you chose to be an audience in front of a screen or stage instead of doing extreme sports or taking over a small country or whatever else you might've done during that time. The trick (and if you can pull this off in your writing, your audience will love you forever) is to wed predictability with freshness. Part of the delight of experiencing art (and the skill involved in making it) is when something absolutely predictable still manages to surprise. But if you write within the genre, the patterns and structure will still be there. There will be a beginning. There will be a problem. It will get complicated. After significant struggle, there will be a resolution, often from some seemingly minor detail you remember from waaaay back at the beginning. And when it's over, you'll feel smarter than the formula but satisfied your expectations were met. After all, it's not free-form space-jazz accompanying alien performance art you're viewing, it's mass-market entertainment, and if it didn't hit your specific yippee-button this time or alter your very existence, tough nuts. That's your job. That's called living.
If you're an artist or a writer, the last thing you should think about is whether or not what you're making is Art. At minimum, it is art, no question, so start there. Focus on the purpose, on the idea, on the thing itself, and if that means focusing on the deadline or the frame or the project specs or the forumula, do that. Because everything that ever went from art to Art first had to be made.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Perfect Assistants
According to the housekeeper in Gosford Park, what makes a
great servant is anticipation. “They
feel hungry, and the food is ready, they feel tired, and the bed is turned
down.” I’m kinda paraphrasing, but you
get the idea, and she should know what makes a great servant, as she herself is
a self-proclaimed great servant, a perfect servant, and who’d contradict her
anyway? The woman—SPOILER
ALERT—poisoned her employer to keep their son from stabbing him to death…
The perfect servant.
Want her running your house?
Eek.
Being an assistant in the industry is something like being a
perfect servant. It can truly be (or at
least it certainly seems like) life-and-death, but I’ll see anticipation and
raise you creative-impossible-problem-solving.
After all, whether you’re assisting a director, producer, writer,
creative executive, manager or agent, there are always too many hands in the
pot brewing trouble for your target employer.
I think great assistants would probably make great spies for the CIA and
the like, because problems must often be identified, assessed and addressed in
a kind of clandestine manner. The
Industry works with a lot of subjective material that costs a lot of money
sometimes involving extreme personalities, so it’s understandably nervous and
any whiff of a problem just makes confidence, and sometimes shows and related
careers, plummet.
The job is typically to be an entire office and support
staff while also being a perfect dictation machine, electronic organizer, and
all-around human computer for an overworked, completely stressed-out
person. But most assistants I’ve met
who keep their jobs past the first month or so are no where near as obtuse, whiny, or incompetent as what I’ve seen in their on-screen counterparts. Take the “pink and blue” artificial
sweetener scene in Swimming With Sharks.
OF COURSE IT MATTERS what kind of sweetener someone takes, and it’s
absolutely true that no-one who uses BLUE would EVER use PINK in their coffee. That’s just a fact. That the agent tosses a few packets in the
assistant’s face is apparently really humiliating and dehumanizing, but do you
know how many deals and clients can be lost over the slightest perception of
being ignored or details being dropped?
And then there’s the chance of allergies or cross-medications, maybe not
something that would involve artificial sweeteners, but dairy versus non-dairy
creamer? I can’t watch that packets
scene without hearing Gordon Ramsey in my ear from Hell’s Kitchen or Kitchen Nightmares shouting, “you could kill someone!”
I thought I’d see better in The Devil Wears Prada, but when
finally given the chance to run the ball, to act as a First Assistant and get
her boss from Florida to New York when a hurricane canceled all flights, I was
appalled that all the character seemed to do was call airlines. Is she trying to get her boss killed that
she’d hook her up with a flight in that kind of weather? Her only burst of enthusiasm is to ask if
the military might step in for her. I
couldn’t believe it. Money was not a
concern, she could have hired the woman a private car and driver, put her on a
train—not to disparage those who would disagree, but the East Coast is just not
that big. When the job is to move a
body from Florida to New York and you have over twelve hours to do it—do
it. And maybe it seems trivial to an
outside eye, but the Devil in this case is a hard-working career woman with a
crumbling marriage and twin daughters who will be grown and gone before she knows
it. If you don’t think it’s life and
death for a parent to see their kids’ recital, you clearly don’t have kids and
should call your parents today to say you love them. Even the rotten ones.
To be fair, both filmic examples are of new assistants
learning the ropes, and in both cases the characters harbor a kind of resentment about
having the job at all. I have seen some
of the best assistants in action. You
may not—it’s often their job not to be noticed. Having been raised by one of the classics who helped set the bar
(my mom put the “Executive” in “Secretary”), I can tell you they will see you,
and they will remember as much about you as is possible to learn, right down to the
collar preference of your neighbor’s dog.
So be nice to them, ‘cause you might run into a perfect assistant, and
they’ll remember that, too.
Labels:
assistant,
executive,
film,
gordon ramsey,
Gosford Park,
hell's kitchen,
kitchen nightmares,
murder,
poison,
screenwriting,
secretary,
servant,
swimming with sharks,
television,
the devil wears prada,
writing
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Pre-emptive Fear Blows
Worrying is expensive.
It’s like emotional interest attached to any given event.
I don’t care how big or small, all features struggle with
budget. Whether you’re working with a
hundred thousand or a hundred million, no budget ever seems like it can be
enough, you’re always gonna struggle with costs, always going to push for more
money.
Getting a film financed has never been easy, but it’s
particularly tough now with so much uncertainty in the US and world economies,
especially since large-venue distribution (movie theaters) has steadily shrunk
for as long as I’ve been alive.
Independent feature films not completely funded by pre-sales are a
GIGANTIC financial gamble, but there are some hold-outs who do sometimes find
the film equivalent of venture capital – cash with strings – and use it to make
their films.
I worked on one feature that had such funding but a big
chunk of it was coming from a nervous source who stalled production day by day
for weeks instead of releasing the funds.
Delays of any kind drive up costs, and this extended push lost the
production some of its committed talent as their windows of availability closed and they went on to other projects. The film was eventually a month past its
start date and well over budget before a single frame had been shot—caused by
the investor’s withholding of funds—and this only made that same investor even more uneasy
to commit.
Can you say Catch-22?
Meanwhile, everyone held their breath and kept working, clinging to the
hope they’d be able to pay their department employees and vendors.
Production finally started, but the financier insisted it
stay within the original budget numbers, thereby eating the costs of the delay,
and that meant there was no money for music.
At all. None. A script composed to modern published songs
with references to at least one published song and shot in a way that begged a
hip and trendy generation-defining collection of pop music to accompany its embedded array of
meta- and pop-culture references—by necessity—went without. It wasn't a silent film, all involved did their best "in post" to make do with little means and tied hands. But the editing that needed music and sound
design to help the scenes live and breathe, to punctuate performance, to build
subtext or ease transitions – all that was sorely lacking. It hurt the film, and it’s excruciating to see a hundred or more
people give their all to something only to have it flounder.
Labels:
budget,
cartoon,
cartooning,
catch 22,
death,
film,
independent film,
music,
pop culture,
sound,
soundtrack,
stress,
television,
worry
Monday, January 16, 2012
They'll Get You!
I love horror stories – in theory. Like in thumbnail form, interrupted by commercials on a muted TV
during the day with at least four hours between final credits and
sun-down.
It’s not entirely my fault.
Fear and self-doubt are kind of constants with me. Boost either one, I’m hyperventilating under
the covers (because if even a toe is exposed, THEY’LL GET YOU!). I know it’s ridiculous, but it feels
true. I guess I’m “highly impressionable”
when it comes to horror. Example? The Original Star Trek episode “The Man Trap” had me leaping from my door to my bed at night throughout junior high
lest the suction-cup-fingered, salt-sucking, shape-changer “get me.” The first time I tried to read Dr. Jekyll
and Mr. Hyde, I freaked out and threw the book under the bathroom vanity, where
it remained for over three years before I forced myself to retrieve and read
it. Great book, but human malice, even
fictionalized, really disturbs me. In
high school I wept uncontrollably through The Shining and spontaneously burst
into traumatized tears again years later when I glimpsed a tiny fraction of The
Shining embedded in the movie Twister – it’s what’s playing on the drive-in
theater screen as the “finger of God” level five tornado rip the scene and
screen apart. Tornadoes, straight-forwardly
threatening and therefore not scary.
Fathers carving up their families?
Simply terrifying.
But strip away the tension and gore, I love the genre. Horror is rich in extreme characters and
story lines and plot twists. There’s
little I enjoy more than a good horror-story re-cap. As a kid, I did a lot of eavesdropping on the bus or quizzing
friends to get the gist what horror movies or shows were out. My husband often indulges me by re-telling
the stories he knows I’ll otherwise avoid.
He doesn’t seem to view my shying from horror as a weakness. But I do.
In film school, I stupidly decided to “push” myself instead
of focusing on my strengths. I shot a
horror short film about a woman finding a dead body in her trunk only to
realize she’d opened the wrong car…and the killer was still there! It wasn’t very good, or subtle, and since
what little horror experience I do have was viewed on “mute,” I didn’t realize
until my classmates burst out laughing that I’d chosen the very distinctive
score from Halloween, so it played like a parody. The smart play would have been to pretend it was always a comedy,
but I’m a terrible liar. Instead, I
accepted that horror was not my strength and chose a dramatic scene with an
element of horror for a directing class.
Because practice makes improvement at least, right?
Stupid, stupid, stupid me…
It didn’t help that without time to audition I went begging
for actors, so the guys I cast had less than no respect for me and sort of
resented the time-commitment. The scene
was one guy intimidating the other with status, which turns as the other offers
a bodily threat of imminent, extreme harm while the dialog remains
pleasant-sounding. I loved the writing
– tense, packed with subtext, rich language – plenty of room for an actor to
play, I thought. But my guys were
grumps and I was beginning to think the whole thing was a wash when one got
annoyed enough to do exactly what I’d been trying to get him to do.
Except he did it to me.
Right in my face, a foot or more taller than me and
something like fifty pounds bigger than I am (and all muscle in his case – ah,
actors). I don’t think his anger was
real. I’d pushed him and he was pushing
me back. But he could tear my arms from
their sockets, and for a good 30 seconds, he made me believe he might. He stirred all the fear I could ask for, and
he knew it, and he smirked about it.
As if scaring me instead of effectively performing with his
scene partner proved he’s a better actor than I am a director.
Well, obviously he’s a better actor than I was a director,
especially then! The scene was for a
class, and it was only my second directing effort EVER. While he was supporting himself as
professional actor and had been for a couple years already. So when that merry Andrews had the gall to
ask me if I was scared, I barked, “Who cares?
It’s easy to scare me! Anyone
can scare me! Salt-sucking, shape-changers
on Star Trek scare me. I’m not in the
scene, dumb-ass!”
Okay, I didn’t really say “dumb-ass” at the time. Sometimes I think I’d really like to be one
of those fearsome forces on a set who can do things like call big guys dumb-ass
and reign them in with a blood-congealing glance, but that’s not me. Thumper’s parental mantra “if you can’t say
something nice—” rings like tinnitus in my ears. But I did say the other parts, and he kind of listened and we
finished rehearsing.
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Does it Really Matter That...?
When the just-right-and-conveniently-available actor
who has a fan-base and flare enough
to generate the buzz you need
to get a meeting
to pitch and sell
your sweated-blood-to-write original TV pilot
suddenly
lands a re-occurring role on some other show,
does it really matter that,
"if water was whiskey and I was a duck,
I'd swim to the bottom and drink my way up"
doesn't actually rhyme?
Labels:
alcohol,
cartooning,
cartoons,
casting,
ducks,
film,
film school,
pitching,
rhyme,
screenwriting,
television,
tv pilot,
whiskey,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





